Paper Detail

User Feedback Provides a Unique Signal that LLMs Can not Detect

Shachar Don-Yehiya, Leshem Choshen, Omri Abend

arxiv Score 7.3

Published 2026-09-02 · First seen 2026-09-03

General AI

Abstract

Harnessing naturally occurring feedback from user interactions offers a promising learning signal for Large Language Models (LLMs). However, recent studies suggest this feedback is inherently noisy and difficult to leverage effectively. We challenge this conception by demonstrating that user feedback is a highly actionable signal for improvement, and that its perceived ineffectiveness stems from a systematic bias in current evaluation paradigms. To isolate the usefulness of feedback, we construct synthetic data with a definitive ground truth, alongside naturalistic data to validate that our findings hold in real-world scenarios. By comparing model revisions generated with and without access to feedback across both settings, we show that feedback-informed revisions resolve targeted issues at significantly higher rates than baseline revisions. Finally, we expose the root of the evaluation bias: when a model successfully fixes an issue exclusively due to feedback, LLM judges frequently fail to identify the genuinely corrected response, systematically preferring inferior baseline outputs instead.

Workflow Status

Review status
pending
Role
unreviewed
Read priority
soon
Vote
Not set.
Saved
no
Collections
Not filed yet.
Next action
Not filled yet.

Reading Brief

No structured notes yet. Add `summary_sections`, `why_relevant`, `claim_impact`, or `next_action` in `papers.jsonl` to enrich this view.

Why It Surfaced

No ranking explanation is available yet.

Tags

No tags.

BibTeX

@article{donyehiya2026user,
  title = {User Feedback Provides a Unique Signal that LLMs Can not Detect},
  author = {Shachar Don-Yehiya and Leshem Choshen and Omri Abend},
  year = {2026},
  abstract = {Harnessing naturally occurring feedback from user interactions offers a promising learning signal for Large Language Models (LLMs). However, recent studies suggest this feedback is inherently noisy and difficult to leverage effectively. We challenge this conception by demonstrating that user feedback is a highly actionable signal for improvement, and that its perceived ineffectiveness stems from a systematic bias in current evaluation paradigms. To isolate the usefulness of feedback, we construc},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02859},
  keywords = {cs.CL},
  eprint = {2609.02859},
  archiveprefix = {arXiv},
}

Metadata

{}