Paper Detail

A Tight Theory of Error Feedback Algorithms in Distributed Optimization

Daniel Berg Thomsen, Adrien Taylor, Aymeric Dieuleveut

arxiv Score 4.8

Published 2026-05-29 · First seen 2026-06-01

General AI

Abstract

Communication costs are a major bottleneck in distributed learning and first-order optimization. A common approach to alleviate this issue is to compress the gradient information exchanged between agents. However, such compression typically degrades the convergence guarantees of gradient-based methods. Error feedback mechanisms provide a simple and computationally cheap remedy for this issue, but numerous variants have been proposed, and their relative performance remains poorly understood. This paper provides tight convergence analyses for two of the main error-feedback algorithms from the literature, the classic Error Feedback method (EF) and Error Feedback 21 (EF21), by identifying optimal step-size choices and constructing optimal Lyapunov functions tailored to each method. The results hold independently of the number of agents and recover the known best guarantees possible in the single-agent regime.

Workflow Status

Review status
pending
Role
unreviewed
Read priority
later
Vote
Not set.
Saved
no
Collections
Not filed yet.
Next action
Not filled yet.

Reading Brief

No structured notes yet. Add `summary_sections`, `why_relevant`, `claim_impact`, or `next_action` in `papers.jsonl` to enrich this view.

Why It Surfaced

No ranking explanation is available yet.

Tags

No tags.

BibTeX

@article{thomsen2026tight,
  title = {A Tight Theory of Error Feedback Algorithms in Distributed Optimization},
  author = {Daniel Berg Thomsen and Adrien Taylor and Aymeric Dieuleveut},
  year = {2026},
  abstract = {Communication costs are a major bottleneck in distributed learning and first-order optimization. A common approach to alleviate this issue is to compress the gradient information exchanged between agents. However, such compression typically degrades the convergence guarantees of gradient-based methods. Error feedback mechanisms provide a simple and computationally cheap remedy for this issue, but numerous variants have been proposed, and their relative performance remains poorly understood. This},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31594},
  keywords = {cs.LG, math.OC},
  eprint = {2605.31594},
  archiveprefix = {arXiv},
}

Metadata

{}