Paper Detail

Avatar: Toward Autonomous End-to-End Orchestration of Scientific Workflows using LLMs

Suman Raj, Hai Duc Nguyen, Haochen Pan, Ryan Chard, Kyle Chard, Ian Foster

arxiv Score 11.2

Published 2026-09-09 · First seen 2026-09-10

General AI

Abstract

Scientific workflow management (WMSs) systems automate execution, yet orchestrate using fixed, hand-tuned rules. LLM agents promise more autonomous orchestration, but it remains unclear where to introduce agentic reasoning, how to bound its risk, and when it actually helps. We present Avatar, an actor-based architecture comprising an orchestrator, an executor, and a provenance monitor. Each actor's decision policy is pluggable (rule-based or LLM-backed) via a single adapter-validated action catalog, so conventional and agentic control run on the same core across different WMSs. We present an implementation using the Academy framework and evaluate Avatar across three workloads. We observe that Avatar's rule mode reproduces native execution, with a single unchanged core running all three. Moreover, LLM-backed Avatar reports a reduction of compute wastage by $55\%$ and cuts GPU-busy time by $40\%$. Overall, we envision Avatar as a step toward workflow systems that reason about their own orchestration rather than follow pre-fixed rules.

Workflow Status

Review status
pending
Role
unreviewed
Read priority
now
Vote
Not set.
Saved
no
Collections
Not filed yet.
Next action
Not filled yet.

Reading Brief

No structured notes yet. Add `summary_sections`, `why_relevant`, `claim_impact`, or `next_action` in `papers.jsonl` to enrich this view.

Why It Surfaced

No ranking explanation is available yet.

Tags

No tags.

BibTeX

@article{raj2026avatar,
  title = {Avatar: Toward Autonomous End-to-End Orchestration of Scientific Workflows using LLMs},
  author = {Suman Raj and Hai Duc Nguyen and Haochen Pan and Ryan Chard and Kyle Chard and Ian Foster},
  year = {2026},
  abstract = {Scientific workflow management (WMSs) systems automate execution, yet orchestrate using fixed, hand-tuned rules. LLM agents promise more autonomous orchestration, but it remains unclear where to introduce agentic reasoning, how to bound its risk, and when it actually helps. We present Avatar, an actor-based architecture comprising an orchestrator, an executor, and a provenance monitor. Each actor's decision policy is pluggable (rule-based or LLM-backed) via a single adapter-validated action cata},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10509},
  keywords = {cs.DC, cs.MA},
  eprint = {2609.10509},
  archiveprefix = {arXiv},
}

Metadata

{}