Paper Detail

Reference-Based Bias Detection in LLMs via Relative Representations of Hidden States

Marek Jeliński, Jan Dubiński, Maciej Chrabaszcz, Sebastian Cygert

huggingface Score 7.4

Published 2026-09-09 · First seen 2026-09-10

General AI

Abstract

Existing bias auditing methods typically rely on model outputs, requiring costly benchmarks or judge models and potentially missing internal shifts that never appear in generated text. We propose a reference-based method that audits bias in hidden-state representations across related model variants, for example before and after fine-tuning. Because fine-tuning reshapes representation geometry, absolute hidden states are not directly comparable, so we encode each sentence by its similarities to a fixed set of anchor sentences, yielding relative representations in a shared comparison space. There we measure how target groups shift in their association with positive and negative attributes, a quantity we call the Representational Bias Shift ΔB. Across three model families and the WildGuardMix, DecodingTrust and ToxiGen benchmarks, ΔB correlates with output-level bias change in 15 of the 18 settings we test, reaching |r| = 0.84 (p < 0.001) under full fine-tuning and becoming more model-dependent under parameter-efficient adaptation. Thresholding ΔB detects checkpoints whose bias increased with ROC AUC between 0.65 and 0.99, and on WildGuardMix and DecodingTrust it separates them better than a SEAT-based baseline for all three families. ΔB is also stable under changes to the anchor set, attribute sets and target templates. Our method requires no task-specific evaluation data and audits a model in about three minutes, using 3-50times less compute than the output-level benchmarks considered here. We view it as complementary to output-based auditing rather than a replacement for it.

Workflow Status

Review status
pending
Role
unreviewed
Read priority
soon
Vote
Not set.
Saved
no
Collections
Not filed yet.
Next action
Not filled yet.

Reading Brief

No structured notes yet. Add `summary_sections`, `why_relevant`, `claim_impact`, or `next_action` in `papers.jsonl` to enrich this view.

Why It Surfaced

No ranking explanation is available yet.

Tags

No tags.

BibTeX

@misc{jeliski2026reference,
  title = {Reference-Based Bias Detection in LLMs via Relative Representations of Hidden States},
  author = {Marek Jeliński and Jan Dubiński and Maciej Chrabaszcz and Sebastian Cygert},
  year = {2026},
  abstract = {Existing bias auditing methods typically rely on model outputs, requiring costly benchmarks or judge models and potentially missing internal shifts that never appear in generated text. We propose a reference-based method that audits bias in hidden-state representations across related model variants, for example before and after fine-tuning. Because fine-tuning reshapes representation geometry, absolute hidden states are not directly comparable, so we encode each sentence by its similarities to a},
  url = {https://huggingface.co/papers/2609.10060},
  keywords = {hidden-state representations, relative representations, Representational Bias Shift, parameter-efficient adaptation, SEAT-based baseline, ROC AUC, anchor sentences, fine-tuning, huggingface daily},
  eprint = {2609.10060},
  archiveprefix = {arXiv},
}

Metadata

{}