Paper Detail

Exploring Collaboration between a language and a non-language agent

Harini S I, Somesh Singh, Yaman K Singla, Rajiv Ratn Shah, David Doermann, Balaji Krishnamurthy

huggingface Score 8.5

Published 2026-09-02 · First seen 2026-09-03

General AI

Abstract

LLMs are increasingly deployed as orchestrators that coordinate specialized subagents to solve complex tasks through natural language. However, in many important domains like game playing and robotics, the strongest available agents are not language models. Integrating non-language agents with LLMs would require verbalization: compressing their rich continuous representations into sparse textual summaries at each interaction step. To study whether verbalization constitutes a bottleneck, we introduce LLAMIA-Bench, a suite of six diverse collaborative chess tasks spanning three facets: behavioral imitation, state assessment, and natural-language explanation. Each task instantiates a well-established chess problem that neither the LLM nor the chess engine can solve alone. To solve LLM collaboration with non-language agents, we introduce latent state internalization, which projects the subagent's continuous representations directly into the LLM's token stream as learned state tokens, with dynamic re-encoding as actions advance the environment state. Comparing internalization to verbalized integration, our experiments reveal a consistent verbalization debt: the performance gap widens throughout training and persists as the LLM scales from 4B to 14B parameters. A single 14B model, LLAMIA, trained with latent state internalization, matches or exceeds task specialists and frontier models including GPT-5.1 with tool access across all benchmark tasks, and generalizes out-of-distribution where task-specific finetunes collapse

Workflow Status

Review status
pending
Role
unreviewed
Read priority
soon
Vote
Not set.
Saved
no
Collections
Not filed yet.
Next action
Not filled yet.

Reading Brief

No structured notes yet. Add `summary_sections`, `why_relevant`, `claim_impact`, or `next_action` in `papers.jsonl` to enrich this view.

Why It Surfaced

No ranking explanation is available yet.

Tags

No tags.

BibTeX

@misc{i2026exploring,
  title = {Exploring Collaboration between a language and a non-language agent},
  author = {Harini S I and Somesh Singh and Yaman K Singla and Rajiv Ratn Shah and David Doermann and Balaji Krishnamurthy},
  year = {2026},
  abstract = {LLMs are increasingly deployed as orchestrators that coordinate specialized subagents to solve complex tasks through natural language. However, in many important domains like game playing and robotics, the strongest available agents are not language models. Integrating non-language agents with LLMs would require verbalization: compressing their rich continuous representations into sparse textual summaries at each interaction step. To study whether verbalization constitutes a bottleneck, we intro},
  url = {https://huggingface.co/papers/2609.00474},
  keywords = {LLAMIA-Bench, verbalization, latent state internalization, learned state tokens, dynamic re-encoding, verbalization debt, non-language agents, LLM orchestration, huggingface daily},
  eprint = {2609.00474},
  archiveprefix = {arXiv},
}

Metadata

{}