Paper Detail

Said Aloud, Read Different: Cross-Modal Instability in Multimodal Models

Basel Mousi, Fahim Dalvi, Shammur Chowdhury, Firoj Alam, Nadir Durrani

arxiv Score 14.3

Published 2026-08-27 · First seen 2026-08-28

General AI

Abstract

Multimodal foundation models are increasingly used in speech-first assistants that must interpret spoken queries and produce visually grounded decisions. Yet it remains unclear whether semantically equivalent queries yield consistent judgments across modality (text vs. speech) and language (English vs. Arabic). We introduce a speech-augmented visually grounded contrastive triplet benchmark spanning 10,150 culturally grounded images from 18 MENA countries, where each image is paired with one supported statement and two plausible but unsupported alternatives. We define contrastive instability as the conditional rate at which a model fails to resolve all statements within a triplet, isolating fragmented reasoning from complete failure. Evaluating recent multimodal models under text and speech in English and Arabic, we find that modality and language shifts introduce substantial triplet-level inconsistencies that are not fully captured by aggregate accuracy, with speech amplifying partial failures. We make the benchmark publicly available to the community.

Workflow Status

Review status
pending
Role
unreviewed
Read priority
now
Vote
Not set.
Saved
no
Collections
Not filed yet.
Next action
Not filled yet.

Reading Brief

No structured notes yet. Add `summary_sections`, `why_relevant`, `claim_impact`, or `next_action` in `papers.jsonl` to enrich this view.

Why It Surfaced

No ranking explanation is available yet.

Tags

No tags.

BibTeX

@article{mousi2026said,
  title = {Said Aloud, Read Different: Cross-Modal Instability in Multimodal Models},
  author = {Basel Mousi and Fahim Dalvi and Shammur Chowdhury and Firoj Alam and Nadir Durrani},
  year = {2026},
  abstract = {Multimodal foundation models are increasingly used in speech-first assistants that must interpret spoken queries and produce visually grounded decisions. Yet it remains unclear whether semantically equivalent queries yield consistent judgments across modality (text vs. speech) and language (English vs. Arabic). We introduce a speech-augmented visually grounded contrastive triplet benchmark spanning 10,150 culturally grounded images from 18 MENA countries, where each image is paired with one supp},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27135},
  keywords = {cs.CL},
  eprint = {2608.27135},
  archiveprefix = {arXiv},
}

Metadata

{}