Paper Detail
Emre Kuru, Mehmet Onur Keskin, Reza Farahbakhsh, Noel Crespi
Document retrieval increasingly supports high-stakes information access in finance, healthcare, and law. Modern retrieval pipelines vary both in modality (text or multimodal) and in retrieval architecture (dense or late-interaction). These choices impose a hard compromise: the most effective pipelines are too slow and expensive to run at scale, while the fastest fail to retrieve evidence from complex documents. Practitioners must therefore choose between missed evidence and unusable latency, with no principled basis for adapting that choice at the query level. We show that this compromise is unnecessary. Not every query requires the same pipeline. Across benchmarks spanning financial and scientific corpora, no static pipeline dominates. We introduce RetrievalRouter, a lightweight query-aware router that learns, from the query text alone, which retrieval pipeline best fits each query. A single tunable parameter exposes the full accuracy-latency frontier, and for every static baseline, RetrievalRouter offers an operating point that is simultaneously more accurate and faster. Against the best static baseline, RetrievalRouter is 2.5% more accurate and 12.4 times faster. Furthermore, compared with prior adaptive strategy selection methods, RetrievalRouter achieves significantly higher nDCG@5 across accuracy-oriented settings, while matching or numerically outperforming them on both nDCG@5 and latency in latency-oriented settings. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/emrekuruu/retrieval-router.
No structured notes yet. Add `summary_sections`, `why_relevant`, `claim_impact`, or `next_action` in `papers.jsonl` to enrich this view.
No ranking explanation is available yet.
No tags.
@misc{kuru2026retrievalrouter,
title = {RetrievalRouter: Joint Modality and Architecture Selection for Document Retrieval},
author = {Emre Kuru and Mehmet Onur Keskin and Reza Farahbakhsh and Noel Crespi},
year = {2026},
abstract = {Document retrieval increasingly supports high-stakes information access in finance, healthcare, and law. Modern retrieval pipelines vary both in modality (text or multimodal) and in retrieval architecture (dense or late-interaction). These choices impose a hard compromise: the most effective pipelines are too slow and expensive to run at scale, while the fastest fail to retrieve evidence from complex documents. Practitioners must therefore choose between missed evidence and unusable latency, wit},
url = {https://huggingface.co/papers/2608.25625},
keywords = {dense retrieval, late-interaction, multimodal retrieval, RetrievalRouter, query-aware routing, nDCG@5, accuracy-latency frontier, code available, huggingface daily},
eprint = {2608.25625},
archiveprefix = {arXiv},
}
{}