Paper Detail

Are You Sure You're Sure? On the Impact of Instruction Tuning on Confidence and Lexical Diversity

Irina Proskurina, Mayank Kumar, Oyindolapo O. Komolafe

huggingface Score 8.0

Published 2026-08-13 · First seen 2026-08-15

General AI

Abstract

Instruction-tuned language models achieve strong performance across a range of generation tasks, but have also recently been shown to exhibit verbalized overconfidence. In question answering, verbalized model overconfidence may be associated with the consistency of the generated supporting rationales. In this paper, we study whether corresponding changes in the lexical diversity of generated answer rationales accompany changes in model confidence induced by instruction tuning. We evaluate three matched base and instruction-tuned models across question-answering benchmarks and find that instruction tuning consistently alters answer confidence, despite limited changes in predictive accuracy and decreases in likelihood-based calibration. Secondly, we observe a non-uniform effect of instruction tuning on rationale diversity: cross-rationale diversity consistently decreases, whereas surface-level lexical diversity varies in both direction and magnitude across models and benchmarks. Finally, we find that these differences persist after controlling for answer selection and rationale length, confirming that confidence and rationale diversity capture distinct effects of instruction tuning.

Workflow Status

Review status
pending
Role
unreviewed
Read priority
soon
Vote
Not set.
Saved
no
Collections
Not filed yet.
Next action
Not filled yet.

Reading Brief

No structured notes yet. Add `summary_sections`, `why_relevant`, `claim_impact`, or `next_action` in `papers.jsonl` to enrich this view.

Why It Surfaced

No ranking explanation is available yet.

Tags

No tags.

BibTeX

@misc{proskurina2026are,
  title = {Are You Sure You're Sure? On the Impact of Instruction Tuning on Confidence and Lexical Diversity},
  author = {Irina Proskurina and Mayank Kumar and Oyindolapo O. Komolafe},
  year = {2026},
  abstract = {Instruction-tuned language models achieve strong performance across a range of generation tasks, but have also recently been shown to exhibit verbalized overconfidence. In question answering, verbalized model overconfidence may be associated with the consistency of the generated supporting rationales. In this paper, we study whether corresponding changes in the lexical diversity of generated answer rationales accompany changes in model confidence induced by instruction tuning. We evaluate three },
  url = {https://huggingface.co/papers/2608.13430},
  keywords = {instruction-tuned language models, verbalized overconfidence, question answering, lexical diversity, rationale diversity, likelihood-based calibration, huggingface daily},
  eprint = {2608.13430},
  archiveprefix = {arXiv},
}

Metadata

{}