Paper Detail

AI4AI at Test-Time: Strong-to-Weak Capability Transfer via Harnesses

Cheng Qian, Wenting Zhao, Liangwei Yang, Heng Wang, Jielin Qiu, Heng Ji, Silvio Savarese, Huan Wang, Shelby Heinecke

arxiv Score 13.8

Published 2026-08-12 · First seen 2026-08-13

General AI

Abstract

Recent work on distillation transfers the capabilities of large models to smaller ones often by updating the latter's parameters, through teacher forcing, on-policy distillation, and related training-time methods. In this paper, we ask whether such transfer can instead occur at test time. We study strong-to-weak scaffolding: whether a stronger builder model can construct inference-time harnesses that help a weaker target model solve tasks more reliably without any parameter updates. Using four representative Theory-of-Mind benchmarks, each builder model uses 5% of the data as a validation set to iteratively refine its harness over multiple rounds, after which the finalized harness is evaluated on the full test set. Empirically, this form of test-time capability transfer is highly effective, nearly doubling average target-model performance from 0.49 to 0.91. Our analysis shows that the gains come primarily from offloading unstable model reasoning into deterministic code, benchmark-specific routing, and strict answer-format enforcement, rather than from encouraging the target model to reason more extensively or sample more broadly. We further find that builder-model reasoning effort improves harness quality monotonically, platform effects are modest relative to the builder model's own capability, and weaker target models receive the largest gains. These results suggest that inference-time harness design is an important complement to conventional training-time distillation, enabling strong models to transfer cognitive structure to weaker models without retraining.

Workflow Status

Review status
pending
Role
unreviewed
Read priority
now
Vote
Not set.
Saved
no
Collections
Not filed yet.
Next action
Not filled yet.

Reading Brief

No structured notes yet. Add `summary_sections`, `why_relevant`, `claim_impact`, or `next_action` in `papers.jsonl` to enrich this view.

Why It Surfaced

No ranking explanation is available yet.

Tags

No tags.

BibTeX

@article{qian2026ai4ai,
  title = {AI4AI at Test-Time: Strong-to-Weak Capability Transfer via Harnesses},
  author = {Cheng Qian and Wenting Zhao and Liangwei Yang and Heng Wang and Jielin Qiu and Heng Ji and Silvio Savarese and Huan Wang and Shelby Heinecke},
  year = {2026},
  abstract = {Recent work on distillation transfers the capabilities of large models to smaller ones often by updating the latter's parameters, through teacher forcing, on-policy distillation, and related training-time methods. In this paper, we ask whether such transfer can instead occur at test time. We study strong-to-weak scaffolding: whether a stronger builder model can construct inference-time harnesses that help a weaker target model solve tasks more reliably without any parameter updates. Using four r},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.12307},
  keywords = {cs.LG, cs.AI, cs.CL, strong-to-weak scaffolding, inference-time harnesses, Theory-of-Mind benchmarks, test-time capability transfer, deterministic code, benchmark-specific routing, answer-format enforcement, inference-time harness design, training-time distillation, huggingface daily},
  eprint = {2608.12307},
  archiveprefix = {arXiv},
}

Metadata

{}