Paper Detail

FriendBench: Benchmarking Dyadic Familiarity Inference in Humans and Multimodal Large Language Models

Jeffrey M. Girard, Jason Z. Zheng, Jacqueline R. Vertino, Antony D'Avirro, Benjamin Peloquin

arxiv Score 14.3

Published 2026-07-31 · First seen 2026-08-03

General AI

Abstract

Reading a social situation often depends on behavior, not words alone. We introduce FriendBench, a benchmark for inferring whether two people are already familiar or are meeting as strangers, from a 20-second clip of a dyadic ice-breaker conversation. Every pair answers the same type of prompt, so only the manner of interaction can reveal the answer. Across text, audio, and video, we compare 26 models from seven companies against matched human panels over 96 balanced dyads. The best model and the human crowd are statistically indistinguishable on accuracy in every modality, but reach it differently: humans stay balanced across the two answers, while the strongest models lean toward "stranger"---a difference in effective prior, not discrimination. Richer channels help both unequally, and only humans gain from visible behavior on top of speech. We release the stimuli, human ratings, and model predictions.

Workflow Status

Review status
pending
Role
unreviewed
Read priority
now
Vote
Not set.
Saved
no
Collections
Not filed yet.
Next action
Not filled yet.

Reading Brief

No structured notes yet. Add `summary_sections`, `why_relevant`, `claim_impact`, or `next_action` in `papers.jsonl` to enrich this view.

Why It Surfaced

No ranking explanation is available yet.

Tags

No tags.

BibTeX

@article{girard2026friendbench,
  title = {FriendBench: Benchmarking Dyadic Familiarity Inference in Humans and Multimodal Large Language Models},
  author = {Jeffrey M. Girard and Jason Z. Zheng and Jacqueline R. Vertino and Antony D'Avirro and Benjamin Peloquin},
  year = {2026},
  abstract = {Reading a social situation often depends on behavior, not words alone. We introduce FriendBench, a benchmark for inferring whether two people are already familiar or are meeting as strangers, from a 20-second clip of a dyadic ice-breaker conversation. Every pair answers the same type of prompt, so only the manner of interaction can reveal the answer. Across text, audio, and video, we compare 26 models from seven companies against matched human panels over 96 balanced dyads. The best model and th},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.29602},
  keywords = {cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.CV, cs.HC},
  eprint = {2607.29602},
  archiveprefix = {arXiv},
}

Metadata

{}