Paper Detail

Knowing When to Quit: Diagnosing and Training LLMs to Abort Futile Reasoning

Xinyan Guan, Jiali Zeng, Chunlei Xin, Yaojie Lu, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han, Le Sun, Fandong Meng

huggingface Score 13.0

Published 2026-07-31 · First seen 2026-08-14

General AI

Abstract

Large language models generate computationally expensive yet semantically void reasoning on beyond-capability tasks, creating risks where plausible-sounding but incorrect derivations mislead users. We characterize this futile reasoning phenomenon through systematic analysis, revealing universal capability overreach and systematic miscalibration between capability and behavior. The dominant failure mode is specious reasoning, which outputs look superficially valid but contain subtle errors, escalating with task difficulty. To address this, we introduce CaRL (Capability-aligned Reinforcement Learning), which aligns model behavior with capability boundaries through reward shaping that incentivizes refusal over futile reasoning and hindsight refusal augmentation that converts failures into refusal supervision. Experiments demonstrate a substantial reduction in futile reasoning while preserving performance across task difficulties, effectively achieving capability-aligned behavior without sacrificing utility. https://github.com/icip-cas/Knowing-When-to-Quit

Workflow Status

Review status
pending
Role
unreviewed
Read priority
now
Vote
Not set.
Saved
no
Collections
Not filed yet.
Next action
Not filled yet.

Reading Brief

No structured notes yet. Add `summary_sections`, `why_relevant`, `claim_impact`, or `next_action` in `papers.jsonl` to enrich this view.

Why It Surfaced

No ranking explanation is available yet.

Tags

No tags.

BibTeX

@misc{guan2026knowing,
  title = {Knowing When to Quit: Diagnosing and Training LLMs to Abort Futile Reasoning},
  author = {Xinyan Guan and Jiali Zeng and Chunlei Xin and Yaojie Lu and Hongyu Lin and Xianpei Han and Le Sun and Fandong Meng},
  year = {2026},
  abstract = {Large language models generate computationally expensive yet semantically void reasoning on beyond-capability tasks, creating risks where plausible-sounding but incorrect derivations mislead users. We characterize this futile reasoning phenomenon through systematic analysis, revealing universal capability overreach and systematic miscalibration between capability and behavior. The dominant failure mode is specious reasoning, which outputs look superficially valid but contain subtle errors, escal},
  url = {https://huggingface.co/papers/2607.29211},
  keywords = {futile reasoning, capability overreach, miscalibration, specious reasoning, CaRL, capability-aligned reinforcement learning, reward shaping, hindsight refusal augmentation, code available, huggingface daily},
  eprint = {2607.29211},
  archiveprefix = {arXiv},
}

Metadata

{}