Paper Detail

Agora: Enhancing LLM Agent Reasoning Via Auction-Based Task Allocation

Kaiji Zhou, Ales Leonardis, Yue Feng

arxiv Score 19.8

Published 2026-07-10 · First seen 2026-07-13

General AI

Abstract

Enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language model (LLM) agents requires effective orchestration of diverse expert models and tools. However, existing frameworks typically call APIs based on coarse-grained matching between tasks and the functions of expert models or tools, while overlooking critical factors such as performance variability and cost efficiency among functionally similar alternatives. To address this, we propose Agora, a framework that introduces an incentive-compatible auction mechanism for dynamically allocating tasks to expert models and tools. By treating reasoning steps as tradeable items, Agora enables agents to bid based on their rectified competence-ensuring that critical logic is routed to the most capable solver rather than the most overconfident one. Evaluations across five benchmarks show that Agora improves over matched single-model, routing, and cascade baselines under comparable candidate pools, while exposing a controllable cost-quality trade-off through a single auction parameter.

Workflow Status

Review status
pending
Role
unreviewed
Read priority
now
Vote
Not set.
Saved
no
Collections
Not filed yet.
Next action
Not filled yet.

Reading Brief

No structured notes yet. Add `summary_sections`, `why_relevant`, `claim_impact`, or `next_action` in `papers.jsonl` to enrich this view.

Why It Surfaced

No ranking explanation is available yet.

Tags

No tags.

BibTeX

@article{zhou2026agora,
  title = {Agora: Enhancing LLM Agent Reasoning Via Auction-Based Task Allocation},
  author = {Kaiji Zhou and Ales Leonardis and Yue Feng},
  year = {2026},
  abstract = {Enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language model (LLM) agents requires effective orchestration of diverse expert models and tools. However, existing frameworks typically call APIs based on coarse-grained matching between tasks and the functions of expert models or tools, while overlooking critical factors such as performance variability and cost efficiency among functionally similar alternatives. To address this, we propose Agora, a framework that introduces an incentive-compatible a},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09600},
  keywords = {cs.AI, cs.CL},
  eprint = {2607.09600},
  archiveprefix = {arXiv},
}

Metadata

{}