Paper Detail
Qianyu Chen, Canran Xiao, Runxuan Tang
Multimodal large language models must continually adapt to evolving tasks and domains, yet standard continual learning metrics mainly measure whether old answers remain correct, leaving the stability of multimodal grounding largely unexamined. We study this overlooked failure mode and ask whether a continually adapted MLLM can preserve not only what it answers, but also how it uses visual, textual, OCR, chart, and document evidence. We identify \emph{hidden evidence-use forgetting}, where answer accuracy is retained while the model silently shifts toward different or less grounded evidence channels, and propose \textsc{RCL}, a replay-free reliance-constrained continual learning framework. \textsc{RCL} freezes the previous checkpoint as a behavioral reference, estimates teacher and student evidence-reliance profiles through counterfactual channel interventions, and jointly optimizes task learning, prediction preservation, and reliance preservation without adding inference-time cost. Across CoIN, COAST, MCITlib, and an evidence-sensitive multimodal stream, \textsc{RCL} consistently improves final performance and reduces forgetting over replay-free, PEFT, routing, and memory-assisted baselines, while substantially lowering modality reliance drift, dominant evidence flips, and hidden forgetting rates. These results suggest that robust continual multimodal learning requires preserving the evidence path behind correct answers, not merely the answers themselves.
No structured notes yet. Add `summary_sections`, `why_relevant`, `claim_impact`, or `next_action` in `papers.jsonl` to enrich this view.
No ranking explanation is available yet.
No tags.
@article{chen2026hidden,
title = {Hidden Forgetting in Continual Multimodal Learning: When Accuracy Survives but Grounding Fails},
author = {Qianyu Chen and Canran Xiao and Runxuan Tang},
year = {2026},
abstract = {Multimodal large language models must continually adapt to evolving tasks and domains, yet standard continual learning metrics mainly measure whether old answers remain correct, leaving the stability of multimodal grounding largely unexamined. We study this overlooked failure mode and ask whether a continually adapted MLLM can preserve not only what it answers, but also how it uses visual, textual, OCR, chart, and document evidence. We identify \textbackslash{}emph\{hidden evidence-use forgetting\}, where answer},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02020},
keywords = {cs.AI},
eprint = {2607.02020},
archiveprefix = {arXiv},
}
{}