Paper Detail

RubricsTree: Scalable and Evolving Open-Ended Evaluation of Personal Health Agents across Health Memory and Medical Skills

Weizhi Zhang, Zechen Li, Hamid Palangi, Ben Graef, A. Ali Heydari, Simon A. Lee, Salman Rahman, Ray Luo, Zeinab Esmaeilpour, Erik Schenck, Chloe Zhang, Yamin Li, Menglian Zhou, Philip S. Yu, Daniel McDuff, Lindsey Sunden, Mark Malhotra, Shwetak Patel, Ahmed A. Metwally

arxiv Score 11.3

Published 2026-06-16 · First seen 2026-06-17

General AI

Abstract

The LLM-empowered personal health agents with user health (sensor) metrics have offered a promising pathway to alleviate global disparities in healthcare access. However, large-scale clinical deployment remains constrained by an open-ended evaluation bottleneck: physician annotation is reliable but costly and unscalable, while LLM-as-a-judge evaluators are scalable but subjective, inconsistent, and sometimes clinically misaligned. We introduce RubricsTree, a scalable evaluation framework with an expert-aligned hierarchical taxonomy of over 100 atomic, clinically-verifiable Boolean rubrics, evolving from the insights of 4,000 real user queries through an iterative human-in-the-loop curation protocol with an expertise panel led by an experienced physician. A context-aware adaptive router activates only the relevant auto-weighted rubric subset per query, providing the throughput needed for scalable evaluation with expert-aligned quality. Through a systematic meta-evaluation, we show that RubricsTree (i) substantially exceeds a strong large-scale evaluation baseline in expert alignment on challenging open-ended queries; (ii) reliably penalizes contextually degraded responses; and (iii) when used as structured instructions, text feedback, or training rewards for performance optimization, yields up to ~66% relative gains on HealthBench for Gemini, GPT, and Qwen model families. RubricsTree thus provides a scalable, auditable, and evolving evaluation infrastructure required for the continuous optimization of product-level personal healthcare AI.

Workflow Status

Review status
pending
Role
unreviewed
Read priority
now
Vote
Not set.
Saved
no
Collections
Not filed yet.
Next action
Not filled yet.

Reading Brief

No structured notes yet. Add `summary_sections`, `why_relevant`, `claim_impact`, or `next_action` in `papers.jsonl` to enrich this view.

Why It Surfaced

No ranking explanation is available yet.

Tags

No tags.

BibTeX

@article{zhang2026rubricstree,
  title = {RubricsTree: Scalable and Evolving Open-Ended Evaluation of Personal Health Agents across Health Memory and Medical Skills},
  author = {Weizhi Zhang and Zechen Li and Hamid Palangi and Ben Graef and A. Ali Heydari and Simon A. Lee and Salman Rahman and Ray Luo and Zeinab Esmaeilpour and Erik Schenck and Chloe Zhang and Yamin Li and Menglian Zhou and Philip S. Yu and Daniel McDuff and Lindsey Sunden and Mark Malhotra and Shwetak Patel and Ahmed A. Metwally},
  year = {2026},
  abstract = {The LLM-empowered personal health agents with user health (sensor) metrics have offered a promising pathway to alleviate global disparities in healthcare access. However, large-scale clinical deployment remains constrained by an open-ended evaluation bottleneck: physician annotation is reliable but costly and unscalable, while LLM-as-a-judge evaluators are scalable but subjective, inconsistent, and sometimes clinically misaligned. We introduce RubricsTree, a scalable evaluation framework with an},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.18203},
  keywords = {cs.CL, cs.AI},
  eprint = {2606.18203},
  archiveprefix = {arXiv},
}

Metadata

{}