Paper Detail
Bowen Ping, Xiangxin Zhou, Penghui Qi, Minnan Luo, Liefeng Bo, Tianyu Pang
Recent work has demonstrated that online reinforcement learning (RL) can substantially improve the quality and alignment of flow matching models for image and video generation. Methods such as Flow-GRPO and CPS cast the denoising process as a Markov Decision Process and apply PPO-style ratio clipping to enforce a trust region. However, we argue that ratio clipping is structurally ill-suited for flow models: the probability ratio between new and old policies is a noisy, single-sample estimate of the true policy divergence, leading to over-constraining in some regions of the trajectory and under-constraining in others. We propose Flow-DPPO (Flow Divergence Proximal Policy Optimization), which replaces ratio clipping with a divergence proximal constraint. A key observation is that the per-step policy in flow models is Gaussian, enabling exact and cheap computation of the KL divergence between old and new policies. Flow-DPPO employs an asymmetric divergence mask that blocks gradient updates only when they simultaneously move away from the trusted region and violate the divergence threshold. Experiments show that Flow-DPPO achieves higher rewards with better KL-proximal efficiency, alleviates catastrophic forgetting, promotes balanced multi-objective optimization, and enables stable multi-epoch training where ratio clipping degrades. Code and models are available at https://github.com/Tencent-Hunyuan/UniRL/tree/main/FlowDPPO.
No structured notes yet. Add `summary_sections`, `why_relevant`, `claim_impact`, or `next_action` in `papers.jsonl` to enrich this view.
No ranking explanation is available yet.
No tags.
@misc{ping2026flow,
title = {Flow-DPPO: Divergence Proximal Policy Optimization for Flow Matching Models},
author = {Bowen Ping and Xiangxin Zhou and Penghui Qi and Minnan Luo and Liefeng Bo and Tianyu Pang},
year = {2026},
abstract = {Recent work has demonstrated that online reinforcement learning (RL) can substantially improve the quality and alignment of flow matching models for image and video generation. Methods such as Flow-GRPO and CPS cast the denoising process as a Markov Decision Process and apply PPO-style ratio clipping to enforce a trust region. However, we argue that ratio clipping is structurally ill-suited for flow models: the probability ratio between new and old policies is a noisy, single-sample estimate of },
url = {https://huggingface.co/papers/2606.11025},
keywords = {online reinforcement learning, flow matching models, denoising process, Markov Decision Process, PPO-style ratio clipping, trust region, policy divergence, KL divergence, asymmetric divergence mask, catastrophic forgetting, multi-objective optimization, multi-epoch training, huggingface daily},
eprint = {2606.11025},
archiveprefix = {arXiv},
}
{}