Paper Detail
Harshit Joshi, Priyank Shethia, Jadelynn Dao, Monica S. Lam
Real-world document question answering is challenging. Analysts must synthesize evidence across multiple documents and different parts of each document. However, any fixed LLM context window can be exceeded as document collections grow. A common workaround is to decompose documents into chunks and assemble answers from chunk-level outputs, but this introduces an aggregation bottleneck: as the number of chunks grows, systems must still combine and reason over an increasingly large body of extracted evidence. We present SLIDERS, a framework for question answering over long document collections through structured reasoning. SLIDERS extracts salient information into a relational database, enabling scalable reasoning over persistent structured state via SQL rather than concatenated text. To make this locally extracted representation globally coherent, SLIDERS introduces a data reconciliation stage that leverages provenance, extraction rationales, and metadata to detect and repair duplicated, inconsistent, and incomplete records. SLIDERS outperforms all baselines on three existing long-context benchmarks, despite all of them fitting within the context window of strong base LLMs, exceeding GPT-4.1 by 6.6 points on average. It also improves over the next best baseline by ~19 and ~32 points on two new benchmarks at 3.9M and 36M tokens, respectively.
No structured notes yet. Add `summary_sections`, `why_relevant`, `claim_impact`, or `next_action` in `papers.jsonl` to enrich this view.
No ranking explanation is available yet.
No tags.
@misc{joshi2026contexts,
title = {Contexts are Never Long Enough: Structured Reasoning for Scalable Question Answering over Long Document Sets},
author = {Harshit Joshi and Priyank Shethia and Jadelynn Dao and Monica S. Lam},
year = {2026},
abstract = {Real-world document question answering is challenging. Analysts must synthesize evidence across multiple documents and different parts of each document. However, any fixed LLM context window can be exceeded as document collections grow. A common workaround is to decompose documents into chunks and assemble answers from chunk-level outputs, but this introduces an aggregation bottleneck: as the number of chunks grows, systems must still combine and reason over an increasingly large body of extract},
url = {https://huggingface.co/papers/2604.22294},
keywords = {question answering, long document collections, structured reasoning, relational database, SQL, data reconciliation, provenance, extraction rationales, metadata, aggregation bottleneck, chunk-level outputs, code available, huggingface daily},
eprint = {2604.22294},
archiveprefix = {arXiv},
}
{}