Paper Detail

MM-JudgeBias: A Benchmark for Evaluating Compositional Biases in MLLM-as-a-Judge

Sua Lee, Sanghee Park, Jinbae Im

huggingface Score 14.5

Published 2026-04-20 · First seen 2026-04-22

General AI

Abstract

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have been increasingly used as automatic evaluators-a paradigm known as MLLM-as-a-Judge. However, their reliability and vulnerabilities to biases remain underexplored. We find that many MLLM judges fail to reliably integrate key visual or textual cues, yielding unreliable evaluations when evidence is missing or mismatched, and exhibiting instability under semantically irrelevant perturbations. To address this, we systematically define Compositional Bias in MLLM-as-a-Judge systems and introduce MM-JudgeBias, a benchmark for evaluating it. MM-JudgeBias introduces controlled perturbations across Query, Image, and Response, and evaluates model behavior via two complementary metrics: Bias-Deviation (BD) for sensitivity and Bias-Conformity (BC) for stability. Our dataset of over 1,800 curated and refined multimodal samples, drawn from 29 source benchmarks, enables a fine-grained diagnosis of nine bias types across diverse tasks and domains. Experiments on 26 state-of-the-art MLLMs reveal systematic modality neglect and asymmetric evaluation tendencies, underscoring the need for more reliable judges.

Workflow Status

Review status
pending
Role
unreviewed
Read priority
now
Vote
Not set.
Saved
no
Collections
Not filed yet.
Next action
Not filled yet.

Reading Brief

No structured notes yet. Add `summary_sections`, `why_relevant`, `claim_impact`, or `next_action` in `papers.jsonl` to enrich this view.

Why It Surfaced

No ranking explanation is available yet.

Tags

No tags.

BibTeX

@misc{lee2026mm,
  title = {MM-JudgeBias: A Benchmark for Evaluating Compositional Biases in MLLM-as-a-Judge},
  author = {Sua Lee and Sanghee Park and Jinbae Im},
  year = {2026},
  abstract = {Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have been increasingly used as automatic evaluators-a paradigm known as MLLM-as-a-Judge. However, their reliability and vulnerabilities to biases remain underexplored. We find that many MLLM judges fail to reliably integrate key visual or textual cues, yielding unreliable evaluations when evidence is missing or mismatched, and exhibiting instability under semantically irrelevant perturbations. To address this, we systematically define Compositional Bias i},
  url = {https://huggingface.co/papers/2604.18164},
  keywords = {Multimodal Large Language Models, MLLM-as-a-Judge, Compositional Bias, MM-JudgeBias, Bias-Deviation, Bias-Conformity, code available, huggingface daily},
  eprint = {2604.18164},
  archiveprefix = {arXiv},
}

Metadata

{}