Paper Detail

CIG: Measuring Conversational Information Gain in Deliberative Dialogues with Semantic Memory Dynamics

Ming-Bin Chen, Jey Han Lau, Lea Frermann

arxiv Score 6.3

Published 2026-04-17 · First seen 2026-04-20

General AI

Abstract

Measuring the quality of public deliberation requires evaluating not only civility or argument structure, but also the informational progress of a conversation. We introduce a framework for Conversational Information Gain (CIG) that evaluates each utterance in terms of how it advances collective understanding of the target topic. To operationalize CIG, we model an evolving semantic memory of the discussion: the system extracts atomic claims from utterances and incrementally consolidates them into a structured memory state. Using this memory, we score each utterance along three interpretable dimensions: Novelty, Relevance, and Implication Scope. We annotate 80 segments from two moderated deliberative settings (TV debates and community discussions) with these dimensions and show that memory-derived dynamics (e.g., the number of claim updates) correlate more strongly with human-perceived CIG than traditional heuristics such as utterance length or TF--IDF. We develop effective LLM-based CIG predictors paving the way for information-focused conversation quality analysis in dialogues and deliberative success.

Workflow Status

Review status
pending
Role
unreviewed
Read priority
soon
Vote
Not set.
Saved
no
Collections
Not filed yet.
Next action
Not filled yet.

Reading Brief

No structured notes yet. Add `summary_sections`, `why_relevant`, `claim_impact`, or `next_action` in `papers.jsonl` to enrich this view.

Why It Surfaced

No ranking explanation is available yet.

Tags

No tags.

BibTeX

@article{chen2026cig,
  title = {CIG: Measuring Conversational Information Gain in Deliberative Dialogues with Semantic Memory Dynamics},
  author = {Ming-Bin Chen and Jey Han Lau and Lea Frermann},
  year = {2026},
  abstract = {Measuring the quality of public deliberation requires evaluating not only civility or argument structure, but also the informational progress of a conversation. We introduce a framework for Conversational Information Gain (CIG) that evaluates each utterance in terms of how it advances collective understanding of the target topic. To operationalize CIG, we model an evolving semantic memory of the discussion: the system extracts atomic claims from utterances and incrementally consolidates them int},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15647},
  keywords = {cs.CL},
  eprint = {2604.15647},
  archiveprefix = {arXiv},
}

Metadata

{}