Paper Detail

Benchmarking Optimizers for MLPs in Tabular Deep Learning

Yury Gorishniy, Ivan Rubachev, Dmitrii Feoktistov, Artem Babenko

arxiv Score 4.3

Published 2026-04-16 · First seen 2026-04-17

General AI

Abstract

MLP is a heavily used backbone in modern deep learning (DL) architectures for supervised learning on tabular data, and AdamW is the go-to optimizer used to train tabular DL models. Unlike architecture design, however, the choice of optimizer for tabular DL has not been examined systematically, despite new optimizers showing promise in other domains. To fill this gap, we benchmark \Noptimizers optimizers on \Ndatasets tabular datasets for training MLP-based models in the standard supervised learning setting under a shared experiment protocol. Our main finding is that the Muon optimizer consistently outperforms AdamW, and thus should be considered a strong and practical choice for practitioners and researchers, if the associated training efficiency overhead is affordable. Additionally, we find exponential moving average of model weights to be a simple yet effective technique that improves AdamW on vanilla MLPs, though its effect is less consistent across model variants.

Workflow Status

Review status
pending
Role
unreviewed
Read priority
later
Vote
Not set.
Saved
no
Collections
Not filed yet.
Next action
Not filled yet.

Reading Brief

No structured notes yet. Add `summary_sections`, `why_relevant`, `claim_impact`, or `next_action` in `papers.jsonl` to enrich this view.

Why It Surfaced

No ranking explanation is available yet.

Tags

No tags.

BibTeX

@article{gorishniy2026benchmarking,
  title = {Benchmarking Optimizers for MLPs in Tabular Deep Learning},
  author = {Yury Gorishniy and Ivan Rubachev and Dmitrii Feoktistov and Artem Babenko},
  year = {2026},
  abstract = {MLP is a heavily used backbone in modern deep learning (DL) architectures for supervised learning on tabular data, and AdamW is the go-to optimizer used to train tabular DL models. Unlike architecture design, however, the choice of optimizer for tabular DL has not been examined systematically, despite new optimizers showing promise in other domains. To fill this gap, we benchmark \textbackslash{}Noptimizers optimizers on \textbackslash{}Ndatasets tabular datasets for training MLP-based models in the standard supervised learn},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15297},
  keywords = {cs.LG, Benchmarking, Benchmark (surveying), Computer science, Artificial intelligence, Deep learning},
  eprint = {2604.15297},
  archiveprefix = {arXiv},
}

Metadata

{}