Paper Detail

Emergence WebVoyager: Toward Consistent and Transparent Evaluation of (Web) Agents in The Wild

Deepak Akkil, Mowafak Allaham, Amal Raj, Tamer Abuelsaad, Ravi Kokku

arxiv Score 12.0

Published 2026-03-30 · First seen 2026-04-01

Research Track B · General AI

Abstract

Reliable evaluation of AI agents operating in complex, real-world environments requires methodologies that are robust, transparent, and contextually aligned with the tasks agents are intended to perform. This study identifies persistent shortcomings in existing AI agent evaluation practices that are particularly acute in web agent evaluation, as exemplified by our audit of WebVoyager, including task-framing ambiguity and operational variability that hinder meaningful and reproducible performance comparisons. To address these challenges, we introduce Emergence WebVoyager, an enhanced version of the WebVoyager benchmark that standardizes evaluation methodology through clear guidelines for task instantiation, failure handling, annotation, and reporting. Emergence WebVoyager achieves an inter-annotator agreement of 95.9\%, indicating improved clarity and reliability in both task formulation and evaluation. Applying this framework to evaluate OpenAI Operator reveals substantial performance variation across domains and task types, with an overall success rate of 68.6\%, substantially lower than the 87\% previously reported by OpenAI, demonstrating the utility of our approach for more rigorous and comparable web agent evaluation.

Workflow Status

Review status
pending
Role
unreviewed
Read priority
now
Vote
Not set.
Saved
no
Collections
Not filed yet.
Next action
Not filled yet.

Reading Brief

No structured notes yet. Add `summary_sections`, `why_relevant`, `claim_impact`, or `next_action` in `papers.jsonl` to enrich this view.

Why It Surfaced

No ranking explanation is available yet.

Tags

No tags.

BibTeX

@article{akkil2026emergence,
  title = {Emergence WebVoyager: Toward Consistent and Transparent Evaluation of (Web) Agents in The Wild},
  author = {Deepak Akkil and Mowafak Allaham and Amal Raj and Tamer Abuelsaad and Ravi Kokku},
  year = {2026},
  abstract = {Reliable evaluation of AI agents operating in complex, real-world environments requires methodologies that are robust, transparent, and contextually aligned with the tasks agents are intended to perform. This study identifies persistent shortcomings in existing AI agent evaluation practices that are particularly acute in web agent evaluation, as exemplified by our audit of WebVoyager, including task-framing ambiguity and operational variability that hinder meaningful and reproducible performance},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29020},
  keywords = {cs.AI},
  eprint = {2603.29020},
  archiveprefix = {arXiv},
}

Metadata

{}